Wednesday, 16 October 2013

suggestion #1 to GOM from FoRum for Inclusive, Equitable and Natural Development of Societies (FRIENDS)-Relocate the govt institutions from Hyderabad into clusters of rural villages

Equitable Relocation of
Government funded Elite Higher Educational/Research and Training Institutions and PSUs
from Greater Hyderabad and other big cities of Andhra Pradesh, India into
Clusters of Rural Villages in the Remaining Districts as Multiple Campuses

An appeal / Feedback from
FoRum for Inclusive, Equitable and Natural Development of Societies : FRIENDS

Suggestion#1 to Group Of Ministers (GOM) regarding Andhra Pradesh   sent by email to feedbacktogom-mha@nic.in
[For reasons of brevity, the details of implementing the relocation process are not mentioned here which can be worked out by those who are familiar with the art and science of the process and several innovations are possible. For one, acquisition of needed lands in the rural village clusters is presumed to be  long term but rational ‘dynamic lease’. For another, some of the multiple campuses of a given elite institution under ‘its own name and style’ are to be located equitably   in different regions of the state and preferably face the campus of another institute from a different region in a cluster or a nearby cluster so that a healthy competition and cooperation can follow with due respect to the different cultures and styles. Relocation versus additional campuses or just new institutions is debatable, but for reasons of brevity, it is confined to ‘why and  how’ relocation can be a better option for not only the holistic development of the societies in an inclusive, equitable and natural manner but also  from  the market economics and mass support. The basis for the sustained mass support would be the sincerity of expert teachers’ efforts in which they are direct partners with their local ‘talents and renewable resources’ and the extent of success   of their innovative and operational production systems in the four vital sectors of local and global interest, namely, ‘drinking water, energy, food and housing’ which also figure in the millennium goals adopted by the UN.]

We, the FoRum for Inclusive, Equitable and Natural Development of Societies(FRIENDS), hereby humbly submit our suggestions regarding Andhra Pradesh in response to the invitation for the same from GOM under the Ministry of Home Affairs, GOI as detailed below for due  consideration in three parts:
Subject Matter Or The Appeal : Equitable Relocation of  Government Funded Elite & Higher Educational / Research and Training Institutions and PSUs,  from Greater Hyderabad and other big cities of AP  into  Clusters of Rural Villages in the Remaining Districts as Multiple Campuses.

I.   The positive outcome of implementing the above Appeal
II.  The action to be taken
III.  The mandate to the elite institutions

I.   The positive outcome of implementing the above Appeal

I.1. The actions, related to the relocation, is based on the age old pragmatism expressed in, “A bird in hand is better than two in the bush” and lend the vital completeness to the famed, much debated and nationally agreed ‘PURA’ since elite Education, Research and Training are hither to the most characteristic features of all the ‘Urban Amenities’. The relocation alone has the potential to exert a healthy influence on  the way path of development is chosen in our democracy. Further, the suggested actions   would also have ‘mass appeal and support’ with a huge potential even in the periodic election based multiparty democracy on several counts. But the prime ones that can be assessed immediately by snap opinion polls among the rural areas and emerging towns and cities would be:
I.1.a) the sheer joy of  the rural folks with the unheard and undreamt  possibility of
the   physical proximity of elite institutions that attract the best talent in students, youth and elders from all over the state and the country and
the sense of  ownership of every impactful  innovation that comes up from the cluster by some rural community or the other in the entire country,  if the same is replicated all over the country.  
I.1.b) the poor farmers, including the landless ones, would be thrilled by the economic prospects, some of which would be
i)  the very possibility of guaranteed monthly lease incomes from the state, like inflation compensated salaries for generations to come,  the most secure insurance against the vagaries  of Nature. (land is only by  lease for the institutions in the new clusters and the lease is tied to the land rates) .
ii) it would be they who would take care of the plants and all the greenery of every beautiful campus in which ever capacity: either as the sole owner  of the approved horticulture horticulture / floriculture plantations that they are comfortable with or as contract farmer  for the fancy greenery like exotic lawns, shrubs or trees,  that bring  beautiful biodiversity  to the campus.  

I.1.2. The finance ministry should be happy to note that the lease cost of the land in the remote rural areas would be a tiny fraction of the astronomical opportunity cost of the prime urban lands that would become  available to GOI  in the mega / big cities anywhere in the country.

I.3. The institutions and PSUs would act as catalysts for inclusive, equitable and natural development of rural societies that is sustainable. Thus the above initiative has the potential to address the projected mega  problems of  mass migration to urban areas by containing/limiting the very migration from the rural areas  in the first place.

I.4.   The above would naturally spur a healthy growth of urban societies as well.  The immediate pain of the loss of the proximity of elite institutions would be soon  compensated to a large extent by the  quantum jump in the primary and secondary school facilities, enormous urban beautiful green and open spaces with several world class facilities in sports and convention centres with the attendant hospitality services.
Further, everyone in the communities at the bottom of the urban pyramid should also be thrilled by the prospect of a tiny home that they can call their own. It would give a great opportunity  to the  urban politicians of promising homes to homeless and  the poorest of the poor in the prime urban areas. None of these could ever even be dreamt of so far.

I.5. Right now the urban growth is near chaotic at best and is more like a cancerous one, with the successive governments( of whatever parties) for ever engaged merely in fire fighting and  often resorting to appease some one or the other of the societies. Such short sighted actions and knee jerk reactions ultimately threaten the very unity and survival of Indian democracy.

II.  The action to be taken
II.1.a) All the central and state government institutions and public sector undertakings presently located in the Greater Hyderabad of today spreading over four districts, about  160 or so,  may kindly be relocated equitably in the remaining 19 districts of Andhra Pradesh (remaining six of the districts in Telangana region and the thirteen districts of the rest of Andhra Pradesh).
II.1.b) The four districts, which have the Greater Hyderabad, any way have the benefit of  disproportionately large  investments in all other areas such as infrastructure, private investments etc.,
II.1.c) The backward districts identified by Sri Krishna Committee and water problem districts like Nalgonda, Anantapur may be given priority.  
II.1.d) The relocation of the government institutions/undertakings from Greater Hyderabad is unlikely to affect  the economy of either Greater Hyderabad or of the state or, for that matter, of the nation with no trace of any  detriment to the interests of  the common man.  

II.2. Of the above  institutions/ commercial undertakings, either  under state or central government control, all the academic ones involved in educational, research and/or training activities may be helped to set up more than one campus under their own current brand name and style but in different regions. It gives a fillip to the higher education, research and training in the entire state while ensuring equity to all the districts of the state. In comparison, a new institution would take much longer (more than a few decades) to grow to compete with the existing elite ones, if at all they do grow. If the new campus carries the brand name of an elite institution, it would be in the interest of its own faculty to ensure that it begins and grows properly while providing a healthy growth opportunity to themselves besides others.

II.3. Similarly, all such elite institutions / commercial undertakings in other major cities like Visakhapatnam, Vijayawada-Guntur corridor, Tirupati, Kakinada, Anantapur,  Kurnool  and   Warangal, in the rest of AP (other than Greater Hyderabad), can be relocated into the interior rural areas of the above mentioned nineteen  districts  of the state. It is a different matter that all of them put together would be no match to even a fraction of the ones in the current Greater Hyderabad.

II.4. The above institutions should also include all the teaching hospitals as well, thus improving  healthcare to rural areas and give an incentive for the young  medicos to serve in rural areas at the end of their UG/PG degrees, a perennial and all pervasive problem in India. Even then, the big cities would still  have a far higher number of doctors and/or beds per thousand population.

II.5.a)  The new location of all the above institutions and public sector units  may be equitably distributed  in 19 clusters of rural villages, at least one but no more than a few, in each of the 19 districts, subject to 1.d above in reference to the districts with water scarcity/ fluoride/specific water problems.   Each cluster may have some 15 to 20 villages of the district, and at considerable distance from even the tier 2 or tier 3 cities of the district with each village of the cluster hosting one or at the most two institutions.
II.5.b) It is preferable to have each cluster spread out in more than one mandal; may be two clusters of neighbouring districts could be close by so that the pair could be viewed as one big cluster.   

II.6.a) The new rural clusters may be given due financial packages so that the necessary infrastructure may be created enabling them to  act as nuclei for growing into centres of innovation excellence at national and international levels.
II.6.b) The cause would be well served by inviting/allowing only the top of the very elite institutions, either public or private, at the national and international levels into these clusters, under their own name and style by mandating them to address the issues and challenges of sustainability while regenerating local resources and restoring the badly damaged ecology and environment as detailed in Part III.

II.7. The vast prime urban lands that get vacated in Greater Hyderabad and the few other big cities of the state can be utilized primarily for advancing primary and secondary schools with playgrounds, greenery and other amenities, all of which could be part of complexes of ‘eco tourism, health tourism, sports tourism and world class convention centres’. Further, huge financial resources can be raised to improve the school education, healthcare and communication infrastructure, including wide band internet all over the state. This alone can ensure the much needed quality manpower for higher education and R&D and transforming the agriculture and industry to meet the national and global challenges.

II.8. A part of the vacated urban lands in the big cities can be used/reserved for housing the urban slum dwellers.

III.  The mandate to the elite institutions:
III.1. Strive to make every ‘village or  sub group of villages in a cluster or a cluster as a whole ‘self sufficient’ in drinking water, energy,  food and housing, with appropriate smart grids and networked logistics using only the various local renewable resources. A national level mission mode approach with experts drawn from academics, R&D, industry, NGOs of even other countries to help achieve the above mandate.  Where local resources of a village or cluster are inadequate, in any sector, priority to be given to those available in the entire district or the neighboring districts.

III.2. The units of PSUs located in a cluster to adopt all the schools (at primary & secondary levels) and teaching hospitals in  all the clusters as part of their CSR, with the respective institutions sharing and owning the responsibility.  The schools are to be on par with the best in the country since all the  children of the cluster ‘should share’ the same schools. Thus the state of the art ‘schools and teaching hospitals’ available in the neighborhood would help in attracting the talented and inspired faculty and others to the rural clusters, besides a unique and healthy  intellectual ecosystem bringing out and rewarding  creativity and innovation in meeting the challenges of sustainability.

III.3. All the possible kinds of renewable energy power plants in each  cluster at appropriate capacities to be planned on ‘BOT’ basis under the direct responsibility of the experts of the different institutions and in collaboration with industry. The Operation part to continue till about 80% of the mandated time so that all the necessary tests for reliability are done and  glitches are solved, before Transfer to local entrepreneurs. The Build part to include design and implementing the integration of the already technically proven ‘individual technologies in isolation’ but may not have been tried and tested in any hybrid integrated  form.  The team/s to pay attention to the local traditional practices, old or on going,  and the skills and knowledge of the local communities in the whole process.    

III.4.  In providing the housing either in the new clusters or in the lands that would be available in the urban prime lands (for the slum dwellers and other bottom of the urban pyramid) priority to be given for ‘relocatable light weight per-engineered multi level buildings’  with local renewable building materials.    

III.5. In the villages that host the institutions, the habitat to provide housing to all (the locals and the outsiders) in a homogeneous manner with priority and respect to the traditional local culture and with a minimal of increase in the area of the village, including that of schools. Land area constraint may be rationally relaxed in case of schools since all the children of the locals and the others would have to share the same schools.  

No comments:

Post a Comment